tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4172950626830217643.post4948756996776675935..comments2024-03-29T05:21:20.598-04:00Comments on Better Embedded System SW: Safety CulturePhil Koopmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11849599272360094243noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4172950626830217643.post-36471535551555400152014-10-13T16:44:42.198-04:002014-10-13T16:44:42.198-04:00I think a widely accepted starting point is IEC-61...I think a widely accepted starting point is IEC-61508. From there it depends upon your industry and the specifics of your product. Looking forward there are some who say that a safety argument might be superior to a safety standard, but that is currently a research topic, and does not mean you shouldn't use a safety standard if there is one suitable to your situation.Phil Koopmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11849599272360094243noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4172950626830217643.post-72862587631677220582014-10-13T07:32:44.913-04:002014-10-13T07:32:44.913-04:00Thanks Phil for this interesting article. From you...Thanks Phil for this interesting article. From your point of view, what are the "most complete" safety standards, the one that have the strongest requirements? On the other hand, again, from your perspective and with your experience, is there anything you would like to improve in any safety standard? If yes, what?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com