My publisher has authorized me to release a free sample chapter from my book. They let me pick one, and I decided to go with the one on global variables. If this is a success, a couple more chapters may be released one way or another, so I'd welcome input on which the other best topics would be from the table of contents.
Entire chapter in Adobe Acrobat (166 KB):
Global Variables Are Evil
• Global variables are memory locations that are directly visible to an entire
• The problem with using globals is that different parts of the software are
coupled in ways that increase complexity and can lead to subtle bugs.
• Avoid globals whenever possible, and at most use only a handful of globals
in any system.
19.1 Chapter overview
19.2 Why are global variables evil?
Globals have system-wide visibility, and aren’t quite the same as static variables.
Globals increase coupling between modules, increase risk of bugs due to
interference between modules, and increase risk of data concurrency problems.
Pointers to globals are even more evil.
19.3 Ways to avoid or reduce the risk of globals
If optimization forces you into using globals, you’re better off getting a faster
processor. Use the heap or static locals instead of globals if possible. Hide
globals inside objects if possible, and document any globals that can’t be
eliminated or hidden.
19.5 For more information
“Global Variables Are Evil” is a pretty strong statement! Especially for some-
thing that is so prevalent in older embedded system software. But, if you can
build your system without using global variables, you’ll be a lot better off.
Global variables (called globals for short) can be accessed from any part of a
software system, and have a globally visible scope. In its plainest form, a global
variable is accessed directly by name rather than being passed as a parameter. By
way of contrast, non-global variables can only be seen from a particular module
or set of related methods. We’ll show how to recognize global variables in detail
in the following sections.
19.1.1. Importance of avoiding globals
The typical motivation for using global variables is efficiency. But sometimes
globals are used simply because a programmer learned his trade with a
non-scoped language (for example, classical BASIC doesn’t support variable
scoping – all variables are globals). Programmers moving to scoped languages
such as C need to learn new approaches to take full advantage of the scoping and
parameter passing mechanisms available.
The main problem with using global variables is that they create implicit cou-
plings among various pieces of the program (various routines might set or mod-
ify a variable, while several more routines might read it). Those couplings are not
well represented in the software design, and are not explicitly represented in the
implementation language. This type of opaque data coupling among modules re-
sults in difficult to find and hard to understand bugs.
19.1.2. Possible symptoms
You may have problems with global variable use if you observe any of the fol-
lowing when reviewing your implementation:
- More than a handful of variables are defined as globally visible (ideally, there
are none). In C or C++, they are defined outside the scope of any procedure,
so they are visible to all procedures. An indicator is the use of the keyword
extern to access global variables defined outside the scope of your compiled
- Variables are used in a routine that are neither defined locally, nor passed as
parameters. (This is just another way of saying they are global.)
- In assembly language, variables are accessed by label from subroutines or
modules rather than via being passed on the stack as a parameter value. Any
access to a labeled memory location (other than in a single module that has ex-
clusive access to that location) is using a global.
The use of global variables is sometimes defensible. But their usage should be
for a very few, special values, and not a matter of routine. Consider their occa-
sional use a necessary evil.
19.1.3. Risks of using globals
The problem with global variables is that they make programs unnecessarily
complex. That can lead to:
- Bugs caused by hidden coupling between modules. For example, misbehav-
ing code in one place breaks things in another place.
- Bugs created in one module due to a change in a seemingly unrelated second
module. For example, a change to a program that writes a global variable
might break the behavior of code that reads that variable.
It may be necessary to have variables that are global, or at least serve a similar
purpose as global variables. The risk comes from using global variables too
freely, and not using mitigation strategies that are available.
19.2. Why are global variables evil?
Global variables should be avoided to the maximum extent possible. At a high
level, you can think of global variables as analogous to GOTO statements in pro-
gramming languages (this idea dates back at least as far as Wulf (1973)). Most of
us reflexively avoid GOTO statements. It’s odd that we still think globals are
First, let’s discuss what globals are, then talk about why they should be
... read more ...
(c) Copyright 2010 Philip Koopman
A connection on LinkedIn asked me for help deciding between job offers. I can't provide personalize advice, but here are my thoughts in ...
(If you want to know more, see my Webinar on CRCs and checksums based on work sponsored by the FAA.) If you are looking for a lightwei...
Cyclomatic complexity is a measure of the number of paths through a particular piece of code (a higher number means the software is more com...
The book is available from Amazon. Here's a description: http://koopman.us/index.html Book Summary This book distills the exper...